<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Probability on Jaidev&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>https://jaidevd.com/tags/probability/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Probability on Jaidev&#39;s Blog</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:33:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://jaidevd.com/tags/probability/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Understanding Allen Downey&#39;s Solution to the M&amp;M Problem</title>
				<link>https://jaidevd.com/posts/mm-problem/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 18:33:41 +0530</pubDate>
				<guid>https://jaidevd.com/posts/mm-problem/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Allen Downey makes a very good case for learning advanced mathematics through&#xA;programming (Check the first section of the preface of &lt;em&gt;Think Bayes&lt;/em&gt;, titled &amp;ldquo;My theory, which is mine&amp;rdquo;).&#xA;But before the reader can hit paydirt with using the Bayes theorem in programming,&#xA;Downey makes you go through some elementary problems in probability, which have&#xA;to be solved by hand first, if you expect to have a clear enough understanding&#xA;of the concept. I can vouch for this way of learning complex concepts. The way&#xA;I learnt the backpropagation algorithm (and its derivation), was with a pen,&#xA;paper and a calculator.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
